'Representing a new generation of theorists reaffirming the radical dimensions of art, Gail Day launches a bold critique of late twentieth-century art theory and its often reductive analysis of cultural objects. Exploring core debates in discourses on art, from the New Left to to theories of "critical postmodernism" and beyond, Day counters the belief that recent tendencies in art fail to be adequately critical. She also challenges the political inertia that results from these conclusions.
Day organises her defense around critics who have engaged substantively with emancipatory thought and social process: T.J. Clark, Manfredo Tafuri, Fredric Jameson, Benjamin H. D. Buchloh, and Hal Foster, among others. She maps the tension between radical dialectics and left nihilism and assesses the interpretation and internalization of negation in art theory.
Chapters confront the claim that exchange and equivalence have subsumed the use value of cultural objects—and with it critical distance— and interrogate the proposition of completed nihilism and the metropolis put forward in the politics of Italian operaismo. Day covers the debates on symbol and allegory waged within the context of 1980s art and their relation to the writings of Walter Benjamin and Paul de Man. She also examines common conceptions of mediation, totality, negation, and the politics of anticipation. A necessary unsettling of received wisdoms, Dialectical Passions recasts emancipatory reflection in aesthetics, art, and architecture.' - from book flap

Includes index.
Alternative title

Columbia Themes in Philosophy, Social Criticism, and the Arts

Access level

Onsite

author
Location code
REF.DAG
Language

English

Publication/Creation date

2011

No of pages

308

ISBN / ISSN

9780231149389

No of copies

1

Content type

monograph

Chapter headings

Introduction

T. J. Clark and the Pain of the Unattainable Beyond

Looking the Negative in the Face: Manfredo Tafuri and the Venice School of Architecture

Absolute Dialectical Unrest, Or, the Diziness of a Perpetually Self-Engendered Disorder

The Immobilizations of Social Abstraction

Afterword: Abstract and Transitive Possibilities

Dialectical Passions: Negation in Postwar Art Theory
Share
Citation
Rights statement

In Copyright

What does this mean?

This item is covered by one or more copyrights. It is available for research only or use within Hong Kong’s fair dealing rules. Please do not copy, re-use or reproduce this item without the permission of the copyright holder.

Dialectical Passions: Negation in Postwar Art Theory