Mao Zedong and other Communist leaders gave calligraphy a revolutionary role, believing that their beloved art lent authority to their words and deeds. Combined with new propagandistic mass media, calligraphy in the People's Republic became more a public performance than a private art. Mass education sparked new interest in this ancient scholarly art, which has provided politically engaged citizens with subtle cues to changing power structures. Beijing has even used calligraphy to smooth relations with Japan, Taiwan, and the overseas Chinese.
Much writing on China offers sweeping assertions about the contemporary relevance of traditional Chinese culture. Where some commentators insist that the Communists have obliterated the old ways, others believe that a century of revolution has failed to relieve the burden of China's past. Kraus examines the changing uses of an important aspect of Chinese tradition and concludes that China, like any other nation, modernizes those parts of its tradition that powerful groups find most useful and discards those that have lost their social basis.'
- front and back sleeves
Onsite
English
calligraphy,  China
1991
208
0520072855
1
monograph
The Institution of Calligraphy in Imperial China
Chinese Calligraphy as a System of Power
Demystifying Chinese Characters
The Legend of the Calligraphy Sage, Wang Xizhi
The Brush as an Instrument of Rule
Art Criticism as Political Commentary
Calligraphy and Revolution
The Cultural Dilemma of the Revolutionary Elite
The Gentlemen Scholars of the Central and South Lakes
The Failed Assault on Chinese Characters
Leninist Calligraphy for Mass Politics
Cultural Revolution Calligraphy: Big Characters and Leftist Lines
Evil Characters, Poison Pens
The Unsuccessful Penmanship of Chairman Hua Guofeng
Postrevolutionary Calligraphy
Calligraphy's New Conventions
A Personal Art in a Changing Society
The Orchid Pavilion's Modern Legacy
Brushes with Power: Modern Politics and the Chinese Art of Calligraphy

What does this mean?
This item is covered by one or more copyrights. It is available for research only or use within Hong Kong’s fair dealing rules. Please do not copy, re-use or reproduce this item without the permission of the copyright holder.